Week+13+--+April+30+-+May+3

//Happy May! Here's a Quiz!//
 * //1 May//**



//Review any key points from yesterday.//

//Corey's article...Krista's article. Short debate using abbreviated CP style.//

//Review Points of Order, ...//


 * //30 April//**

//Alanna's article and CP-style resolution.//
 * //Intro to CP//**


 * //CP Debate video -- we will watch this. It will help. Sorry.//**

//In Canadian parliamentary, Government needs to create a **plan for change**. This is in the form of a **2-part resolution**. The first part is a value ("As the residents of Perth Andover have been unfairly treated by the provincial government as a result of the Mactaquac Dam...") followed by a move for policy change ("...be it resolved that the Government of New Brunswick institute an annual payment of $2345 for each home owner residing within village limits.")//

//Gov maintains these main responsibilities://

//* Show necessity for a plan.// //* Research and disclose the cost involved, how the plan would be implemented, how long it would take, any possible problems with the plan and how they would be alleviated, and what would be needed (infrastructure, labour, etc).//

//Opposition may either a) disagree with he value statement altogether. This rarely happens. b) agree with the value portion, but argue that Government has not sufficiently proven the necessity for that particular policy change; c) Agree with the value statement, but deny the need for change. ("Yes, the gov't has treated them unfairly but there are already measures in place to take care of them. We don't need more.; d) Agree with the need for change but offer their own version of improvement ("Yes, they are treated unfairly, but your ideas still suck and you should do ours.")//

//Based on Alanna's article and res, we come up with//

//Film rants//